join message
Argument: Argument thesis  The US Constitution contains an implied right to privacy that applies to all citizens
Node type: Node refutes parent assertion  This node refutes its parent
Parent Node: Node refutes parent assertion  To distinguish legitimate from unlegitimate unenumerated rights read the Founding Fathers
Node Text: Even if one reads the Constitution and the writing of its authors, meaning is not always clear

quoted from:
Tara Smith Duke Journal of Constitutional Law

"The point is, under the conventions of our language, almost any sequence of words can communicate more than one meaning, depending on the circumstances. Given this, how are we to interpret expression which has a meaning that is not transparent (as often occurs in the cases litigated in appellate courts)? To reasonably interpret what was written, we must appeal to the larger context.

Authors’ intents can be an important part of that. I do not mean to suggest that intent is everything or that the written words are unimportant. The point is simply that words by themselves cannot furnish all that is needed to answer the questions that arise in hard cases."

http://64.233.169.104/...
Node Created: joetab24 — 2008-07-10 04:53:11

Return to parent argument




Pending Arguments

There are no pending Arguments.

Create an Argument!